Covington Weekly » Blog Archives

Tag Archives: senate bill 132

Local History Local News Opinion

To Dredge Or Not To Dredge, What Is The Motivation?

master thesis introduction https://themilitaryguide.org/14days/bye-child-poem-essay-with-thesis/55/ follow link https://dsaj.org/buyingmg/cialis-generika-gnstig-kaufen/200/ enter site https://mswwdb.org/report/essay-table-of-contents-sample/96/ follow link great thesis paragraphs cipralex ja viagra https://plastic-pollution.org/trialrx/should-i-stop-taking-premarin/31/ how to write a personal leadership vision statement am luat cialis see url new zithromax warnings tell if need viagra go to site gcse chemistry coursework titration can i write my college essay about moving to america ed online store reviews https://mjr.jour.umt.edu/admission/ielts-writing-paper-sheet-filetype-pdf/1/ intermediary devices on a network is there a natural form of viagra final project expository essay cosmetic surgery get your assignments done for you https://ergonetwork.org/publications/essay-bible-literature/91/ a tale of two city book report buy cheap generic cialis online https://smartfin.org/science/cialis-neue-indikation/12/ primary research methods advantages and disadvantages https://plastic-pollution.org/trialrx/rote-bete-wirkt-wie-viagra/31/ compare and contrast essay introduction help cialis maxman Published by:

Historically, here in Covington, the beautiful and scenic Bogue Falaya River was dredged in order to accept larger vessels from the south shore and surrounding areas that carried passengers as well as needed goods and supplies.  The Covington Trailhead Museum features historic area photographs and a short video highlighting Covington as a thriving center of trade and tourism back to the early 1800’s, during the Revolutionary founding of this country. The Louisiana Legislature created the Louisiana Natural and Scenic Rivers System for the purpose of preserving, protecting, developing, reclaiming and enhancing the wilderness qualities, scenic beauties and ecological regimes of certain free-flowing Louisiana streams.  Forty-seven years later, that designation is in jeopardy with SB 132, the argument being that dredging the rivers will alleviate the flooding witnessed in recent years.


Based on several articles sent in by local historian Mark Johnson, it appears that previous flooding occurred even when the rivers were dredged.  If the rivers flooded even when they were dredged, why are so many politicians convinced that dredging the river will alleviate flooding?  Being that the mantra here is “development does not cause flooding”, the educated guess is that the politicians’ developer friends are putting bugs in their ears,  because rivers listed on the Louisiana Natural and Scenic Rivers System are regulated to deter major development.


The designation is a double edged sword.  Anyone that enjoys the rivers around here also knows that they could use being cleared out.  On any given stretch of river, it is not uncommon to see fallen trees, limbs, branches and other debris, all of which cannot be removed without a scenic waterways permit.  So, the river may have certain protections, but those same protections prohibit the safe access and use of said waterways.   Is this an unintended consequence of an idea with good intentions?

Newly elected Councilman At Large Patrick McMath was quoted by Fox 8 recently with regard to the issue:
“I speak for the council and the mayor when I say we don’t want to see the words ‘dredging’ and ‘clearing of the banks’ in this bill.”   Masson, May 30, 2017, fox8live.com
Considering that the bill was originally written to allow for the dredging of Baton Rouge area rivers and streams that caused flooding last year, there is a great likelihood that the word dredging will appear in the bill, despite our local politicians’ stated wishes to the contrary.  Whether or not anyone wants to see the word “dredging” in the bill is irrelevant to the fact that it is about dredging.
Voters are used to politicians distorting the truth and misrepresenting facts, but there is also the expectation that our representatives do sometimes listen to the public.
The bill’s original purpose is to dredge rivers.  Why would St. Tammany place itself on a bill concerning dredging, if St. Tammany does not intend to have the rivers dredged?  Why not just craft a new bill that allows for the removal of fallen trees, branches and debris from the river in an efficient manner consistent with preservation?
If forgetting the past ensures repeating mistakes, previous situations faced by the Parish could indicate that there is a larger picture.  During the now infamous St. Tammany Parish Hydraulic Fracturing Controversy, the former St. Tammany Parish Economic Development Director Don Shea’s statement to the council, ‘There’s nothing in the pipeline’ was very telling.  Technically, he was not lying, the pipeline was empty.   It did exist however, and Helis Oil and Gas Co. was ready to run it, before the public even knew who they were, or what they were doing here.
At one Parish Council meeting, a parish attorney berated a member of the public for suggesting that the St. Tammany Parish School Board had any involvement in Helis Oil’s plans for a hydraulic fracturing platform near Lakeshore High School. Interestingly, certain documents with regard to the St. Tammany Parish School Board and the Mineral Rights involving Lakeshore High School property surfaced, suggesting that the School Board may have benefited from a hydraulic fracturing operation located right across the highway from the school in question after all.
Therefore, a healthy degree of skepticism should be a welcome thing in situations that have a high profile, affect large numbers of people and cost a lot of taxpayer dollars.   In conclusion, this article is not intended to make an argument for dredging or against dredging, and there are many pros and cons to both.  The question this article is concerned with is why the politicians believe dredging the river will alleviate the flooding, when historically, the river flooded even when it was dredged.  If the past is any indication, the stated purpose of a particular thing (in this case, SB 132) is merely a consequence of the actuality.

 

Local History Local News

Senate Bill 132 May Affect St. Tammany Scenic River Designation

Published by:

An amendment to SB 132 was added on the Senate floor on May 8 to include four more rivers to the three already in the proposed legislation to allow clearing, snagging and dredging on certain of our Louisiana Scenic Rivers.  The rivers already in Sen. Bodi White’s bill for exemption were the Amite, Comite and Bayou Manchac.  Sen. Sharon Hewitt added an amendment to also exempt the Pearl, Tchefuncte, Bogue Falaya and Abita Rivers from the rule against clearing, snagging and dredging.  The original bill was bad enough;  this amendment turns it into a broad attack on the Scenic Rivers Act in the Florida Parishes – an area which contains some of our more scenic and beautiful rivers.  The bill has passed the Senate and will be heard next in House Natural Resources and Environment Committee;  the date it will come up is unknown, but could be rushed through sooner than later.
The proponents of this bill say that the rivers flooded because they need to be cleaned out, but some areas of these rivers did not flood.  Evaluation of where flooding actually took place shows that wholesale dredging of entire rivers is not justified, or that it is even a legitimate fix to prevent future flooding.  Whatever the real motivation for the proposed legislation, it conveniently clears the path for unrestricted development.

Bogue Falaya River

Any amendments to the Scenic Rivers Act should specify which sections of rivers would be exempted, and be temporary, not permanent exemptions.  Any clearing and dredging of rivers should be conducted on the basis of regional drainage and flood control planning, which currently does not exist.  Nothing indicates that the “snags” in the rivers are the cause of recent flooding.  The more likely culprit is the development of subdivisions and shopping centers in known floodplains, and the building of man-made structures, such as I-12, that block the normal flow of waters from the flooded areas.  What evidence is this bill’s premise based on?  Which study says that dredging each of these rivers will help flooding?  How much consultation and thought went into developing this bill?  There is no reason for Pearl River to be in SB132 – it is not part of the Scenic River program.
SB 132 should be amended to authorize a regional study by qualified hydrologists with recommendations to the legislature on how to reduce future flooding for the entire Florida Parishes area.  This guidance would help in crafting a bill which directly addresses the flooding issues.
We ask that constituents contact their State House member and ask them to protect our scenic rivers.  SB 132 should be withdrawn until a regional flood control plan is developed to show where the expense of clearing and dredging is justified, and to show where such action will actually improve flood control.
Contact: Haywood Martin, 337-298-8380 hrmartin2sc@gmail.com
Margie Vicknair-Pray, 985-373-7097
Margie.vicknair-pray@sierraclub.org